Tuesday, February 27, 2007

We Americans Are All Talk No Action


Americans are confused about sex. Many of the first colonists were Puritans, and a strong puritanical streak still runs through our culture.

Although our sitcoms and soap operas rely on sex to keep viewers watching, many of us consider this type of entertainment a guilty pleasure.

Despite our seeming obsession with sex on television, in movies and on the Web, Americans are actually more watchers than doers. We're a voyeuristic society that seems content to observe others acting sexy.

According to some global sex surveys, Americans lag behind people in France, Greece, Croatia, Poland, Great Britain and even Kazakhstan in having sex.

Part of the problem might be that Americans work too hard. A survey for the National Sleep Foundation found that nearly one-fourth of the couples surveyed were often too tired to engage in sexual activity.

No we are just lame. Women who wear clothes that come off of a rack, if it shows a little skin. They will be called hoes. If ladies shake their bootays in youtube videos they will be called hoes.

But yet porn gets sold in the billions. It's a sick sort of denial. It is almost as though the 60's to early 90's never happened. It's mostly fake knee jerk reaction based on some how a belief that people will some how think badly of them. So they loudly decry any thing that might be arousing.

Those who expected Viagra to increase libido were soon disappointed. While this medication is considered effective for helping a man achieve an erection, that achievement is possible only in the presence of sexual desire. Medical science is still looking for ways to increase libido.

Too many medicines do the opposite — dampen desire. Many Prozac-like antidepressants interfere with arousal or function. Birth control pills, hormone replacement therapy and even some blood pressure medications can reduce interest in making love.

So there is no love potion you still have to want it. Now I am depressed...

Dang It!

I hat it when they jump on things before i see it. M. Jackson was the first caller.



You tell it is not the real G. S. because he said his name too quickly.

Huh!?!

Monday, February 26, 2007

Okay

What am I looking at?



America's stagy est home videos. No I will search for videos that are made to look like oops vids.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Girls Gone 18 U.S.C. §2257


Girls Gone Wild Volleyball
Originally uploaded by tywardinger.
Ok, I can see how it could happen that you would not keep good records taping stuff to put one of these videos together. And remember they had trouble with people not being the age they said or didn't even get asked they were.

Try and follow it.


Prior to the act, the record-keeping requirements applied only to visual depictions of four specific types of "actual sexually explicit conduct": sexual intercourse, bestiality, masturbation, or sadistic or masochistic abuse. Under the DOJ's implementing regulations, producers of material containing such scenes must collect and retain the legal name and date of birth of each performer in the scene, and keep a copy of a government-issued identification card for each such performer, a list of all names ever used by each such performer, and a copy of the video or other matter in which the performer appears. These records must be kept separate from all other records and they must be organized so that they are easily retrievable by the name of each performer and the title of each video or other work. In addition, the records must be available for inspection by the attorney general or his agent.

Against this backdrop, the act expanded the record-keeping requirements in two important ways. First, the act added a fifth type of actual sexually explicit conduct covered by § 2257: "lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic area." Second, the Act added new record-keeping requirements for "simulated" sexually explicit conduct, codified separately at 18 U.S.C. §2257A. On their face, both changes could sweep a significant amount of mainstream entertainment into the ambit of the burdensome record-keeping requirements.

Among other things, the addition of "lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic area" injects a highly ambiguous term into a criminal record-keeping statute. That term is generally applied in cases involving child pornography, and involves a highly fact-specific -- and necessarily subjective -- inquiry. The result is a test for "lascivious exhibition" that is difficult if not impossible to apply with any reasonable degree of certainty -- especially in the context of images of adults. For example, courts have held that, although nudity alone is not sufficient to make an image of a child lascivious, nudity also is not necessary, and have found lascivious exhibition to exist even when the pubic area is clothed. The test becomes even more ambiguous when applied to sexual images involving adults. If this case law is imported directly to the record-keeping context, a broad range of sexual scenes in mainstream entertainment could conceivably trigger record-keeping obligations.

The term "simulated sexually explicit conduct," which is not defined in the statute, is also highly ambiguous. It is not clear, for example, whether "simulated sexually explicit conduct" would include a scene in a mainstream film in which characters are supposed to be having sex but are only shown in bed from the waist up. Such a broad interpretation could cover a wide range of popular content, and subjecting such material to the record-keeping requirements -- with their corresponding criminal penalties -- would place significant burdens on a large amount of valuable and protected expression, thereby raising serious constitutional concerns.

SAFE HARBOR -- TRULY SAFE?

In response to some of these concerns, Congress included in the act a safe harbor provision under which companies that create material containing images that might arguably qualify as "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" or "simulated sexual conduct" will be exempt from the record-keeping requirements. In order to qualify for the safe harbor, the company's material must be intended for commercial distribution and the company must certify to the attorney general that it regularly and in the normal course of business collects and maintains certain identifying information about its performers "pursuant to Federal and State tax, labor, and other laws, labor agreements, or otherwise pursuant to industry standards." 18 U.S.C. §2257A(h)(1). Companies qualifying for the safe harbor are exempt from the record-keeping and labeling requirements and the corresponding criminal penalties.


I think this is all designed to make you just give up..., DUH! Don't do it. Don't simulate it. Don't even think about it.

Snoop


Plaid Skirt
Originally uploaded by Chris Lopez.
In my mid-twenties I looked at teen girls still too. I don't think it was about this though.

What your boyfriend is getting off on is the taboo. The underage fantasy is incredibly common. What's sexy about it? Let's see: the uneven power dynamic, the kinky schoolgirl clothes, the hearkening back to a time when sex was all crazy new and you'd stay up past your bedtime just to catch a three-second glimpse of a tit in a late-night movie. Those are just off the top of my head, but I'm sure you readers can come up with more.


Besides teen porn ain't got no teens in it. And over exploitation has killed that taboo a long time ago.

Love Hotel


Love Hotel "Suika"
Originally uploaded by Datsun Z.
Man how I want to live in Japan. Or just bring some of that over here.

Tokunaga says that the ideal place for exceptional love hotel slow sex will be of relatively recent construction, be roomy with a large bed and not be filled with gaudy decorations or accessories that make the room like part of an amusement park.


I want to ride somebody at the love hotel. Will there be discounts if you bring a soda can? If you live outside the U.S. Six Flags amusement park every year since I was kid offers price off tickets to the park that way...

Well anyway they got these love hotels over there and what the article is about is doing it in slow motion. Versus a wham bam thank you mam. In a joint made out like an amusement park. What ya don't like the jungle theme Tarzan? But I want to go to a love hotel DAMMIT. With my um... Do I have a steady partner?