Smart assed editorial opinions that should be kept to myself. Along with random video clips and pictures to go along with stories I find that you might find worth having seen. Oh and thanks for stopping by and validating my existence, baby.
Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Better Than Chasing Down People With Their Pants Down
UK town axes 6,00 trees to prevent sex romp
Officials say the forest that runs for kilometres along the busy A666 was cleared as some of the trees, planted after the Second World War, were in danger of falling.
Police and councillors have, however, confirmed another reason was to discourage strangers from the known "dogging" area.
Dogging is a term for people having sex with strangers in public places, or watching others have sex, often in woods or country lay-bys.
The felling of 6,000 trees to try to stop couples having sex there has prompted an angry backlash.
"It's awful that a public green space, an asset to the local community, has been destroyed mindlessly. If the law was enforced properly then there would be no need to chop down these trees," Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, was quoted as saying
Jail Time For Sex With A Underage Girl
You start 'em out early with some jail time. Ya end up training them up right as future sex offenders.
That's right the 15yr old should have checked her ID first.
Teenager loses court action over underage sex
[...]A TEENAGE boy has lost his High Court action claiming he should not be prosecuted for having sex with a 14-year-old girl, when he was 15, under the law which allows for boys to be prosecuted for such offences but not girls.
[...]
The case arose out of the so-called “Romeo and Juliet” provision in laws introduced in 2006 in response to the Supreme Court “CC” judgment overturning as unconstitutional a 1935 law on underage sex on grounds of the absence of a defence of “reasonable mistake” as to the victim’s age.
In his action, the boy claimed his rights were breached because he has been charged with unlawful carnal knowledge and with committing buggery while the girl was not charged.
That's right the 15yr old should have checked her ID first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

